
"Taking Flight." (Part One)
With so much emphasis on the approach and landing phase of flight, the humble take-off is frequently overlooked. Often perceived as simply lining up, pushing the levers forward and pulling back when the time is right, the take off is actually a very critical phase of each and every flight.
Surface to Air.
There is nothing quite like that moment when the earth falls away from the wheels and the earthbound restraints transition into freedom in all three dimensions. From the initial surge of power to the nose pointing skyward, guiding the aircraft back to its natural habitat, this is when flight becomes a reality. This is the take-off and for all its majesty, it is also a potentially vulnerable time for man and machine.
Like landing, it is a manoeuvre conducted at ground level where there is little time and altitude for forgiveness. It is susceptible to all manner of variables; environmental, aerodynamic and human in origin. Accordingly, like any phase of flight, the take-off should be given the respect and consideration it deserves. Attempts to rush it can at the very least result in poor handling and at worst leave the aircraft exposed to all manner of lethal variables.
Fundamentally, aircraft are not designed for ground operations, they are meant to fly. As such, designers endeavour to build an undercarriage that will sustain the impact of landing, maintain a straight line at high speed, taxi at slow speeds and offer up the lowest possible weight penalty in the process. Similarly, the wing is meant to fly and generally fly fast. The slow speed envelope is recognised as a necessary evil in transitioning the aeroplane to and from flight, so often aerodynamic devices on the leading and trailing edges are added to facilitate this. Yet on take-off, the undercarriage will be asked to absorb the shock and slipperiness of all manner of surfaces and we will reconfigure the wing so it will fly at speeds that it would really prefer not to.
At the helm sits the pilot who has hopefully both configured the aircraft correctly and considered a myriad of possible eventualities. Should the take-off go awry, decisions may need to be made in a split second and yet enacted with a seemingly unrushed, efficient methodology. As with so many aspects of aviation, the result of thorough preparation is often a routine non-event. Take-offs are no exception to this rule.
The Goal.
In its most basic form, the purpose of the take off is to transition the aircraft safely from the ground into the air. It is not to be considered purely as the instant of lift-off, for there are several components of the take-off both preceding this moment and following it. In fact, the take-off can really be considered as commencing with its planning in terms of weight and balance, performance data and the ambient conditions. Likewise, the take-off can be thought of becoming a ‘climb’ only when the aircraft is reconfigured and at a safe altitude. This may involve reducing power and the retraction of flaps and undercarriage, or simply extinguishing lights and selecting the fuel pump off; it will vary from type to type and even departure to departure.
The take-off is virtually a ‘blink’ in the overall duration of a flight, but the degree of preparation isn’t a function of time. Just ask an Olympic sprinter or world class photographer. Safely executing a take-off is a combination of consideration and physical execution and in ‘Taking Flight’, both will be treated with equal respect. However, to start, let’s review what is actually involved in taking our aircraft from the runway to the sky.
A Numbers Game.
Before the park brake is even released, the ability of the aircraft to physically perform the take-off manoeuvre must be verified. This is a function of numerous factors including aircraft weight, payload, centre of gravity, the runway environment and ambient conditions. Each of these variables plays a significant role in their own way and to overlook any aspect can be fraught with danger.
In most cases, the individual approved aircraft Flight Manual is the defining document in matters of performance. Some larger operators may have an entire approved loading system that is a stand-alone manual or in modern times, part of the Electronic Flight Bag. Whatever the means, there is always a valid method to calculate the limits of an aircraft’s performance in executing a take-off.
The take-off must be able to accelerate and climb away at a safe speed with adequate obstacle clearance in the distance available. In the case of multi-engine aircraft there will also be a need to climb away with one engine inoperative and for higher category aircraft, the ‘stop-go’ scenario, amongst others, becomes a performance dictator. Fortunately, the hard work has been done by test pilots and performance engineers when the aircraft is certified, so the preflight process is a case of arithmetical gymnastics rather than ‘trial and error’ destructive testing off the end of the runway.
Typically with most GA piston powered aeroplanes, the number of seats doesn’t directly reflect the everyday uplift of the aircraft. You may well plan to take 4 people aloft in a Piper Cherokee 140, but that will rule out anything near full fuel tanks. To this end, performance calculations often require the pilot to make do with the best legal solution. If a full load of passengers is a requirement on a cross country flight, the fuel load may need to be reduced and additional refuelling stops must be planned. It will always be a combination of aircraft weight, payload, people and fuel without exceeding any limits. If the numbers still don’t work then it might be time to consider upgrading to a larger, more powerful aeroplane to meet your needs.
Further complicating the matter is that even if the total weight to be uplifted is legal, it must also be loaded in a manner that the aircraft remains ‘balanced’. Like a see-saw, the aircraft can tend to pitch nose up or down depending on how the aircraft is loaded in relation to its centre of gravity. Too far forward and the nose may not want to lift off on take-off, too far to the rear and the nose may just keeping pitching skyward after rotation until the aircraft stalls. To avoid the imbalance of an aircraft leading to disastrous controllability issues, a graphical representation or tabular calculation of the limits fore and aft is used. Calculations of load distribution must have the weight and balance of the aeroplane falling within the safe region known as the Centre of Gravity ‘envelope’. Bearing in mind that this position may also change enroute as fuel is burned.
So your aircraft is loaded to below its maximum limit with fuel, folks and freight distributed in a balanced manner. The next piece of the puzzle relates to the runway environment. Is it long enough? Is the surface long, wet grass which will impede acceleration? Is it sloping uphill? What is the current temperature and prevailing winds? These considerations must also be assessed when using the performance charts to verify that the available runway is ample and suitable for take-off.
Only when the aircraft performance data has been calculated with respect to weight and balance and airfield limitations can a take-off be legally and safely executed. Accident investigations are littered with instances where pilots either overlooked or chose to ignore the performance envelopes of their aircraft. Take the time to do the numbers and peace of mind will inevitably follow.
Ready?.............
Check back here soon for "Taking Flight" (Part Two).












